Rev. Ronald
Hanko
Rev. Hanko is a minister in the
Protestant Reformed Churches in America and has authored a number of books,
including (among others) the following: Doctrine According to
Godliness: A Primer on Reformed Doctrine (2004), The Coming of Zion’s
Redeemer: Commentary on Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi (2015).
He was also the joint author of Saved by Grace: A Study of
the Five Points of Calvinism (1995) and its
accompanying study guide (all of which can be purchased at http://www.cprc.co.uk and http://www.rfpa.org).
*
*
*
*
* *
[Previous
section: “The
Symbolism of Baptism”]
We have been speaking in the
previous section[1] especially of
water baptism, that is, of the sign of baptism.
But it is of the utmost importance, when speaking of baptism, to realize
that the New Testament uses the word in two different ways. A failure to recognize this often leads to
misunderstanding and error.
Sometimes
when the New Testament uses the word “baptism,” it is referring to the sacrament
or rite—what we might call water
baptism:
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and
Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who
hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Matt. 3:7)
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost. (Matt. 28:19)
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be
baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of
sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost ... Then they that gladly
received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them
about three thousand souls. (Acts 2:38, 41)
And were all baptized unto Moses in the
cloud and in the sea. (I Cor. 10:2)
This
is really not baptism, properly speaking, but the sign of baptism—a symbol pointing to an invisible spiritual
reality.
In
distinction from the symbol or sign, the reality
of baptism is the actual washing away of sins by the blood and Spirit of
Jesus Christ. That is the reality of
which water baptism is only a picture.
Speaking of baptism in that
sense, it is entirely proper to say that baptism saves us. I Peter 3:21
speaks of baptism in this way: “The like figure whereunto even baptism doth
also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the
answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” The difference between baptism in this sense
and the sign is the difference between ritual
baptism and real baptism.[2]
Many
passages in the New Testament speak of this spiritual saving reality and not of
the sign, that is, not of water baptism.
The most notable of these passages are I Corinthians 12:13, Romans
6:3-6, Galatians 3:27, Ephesians 4:5, Colossians 2:12, and all those passages
which speak of being baptized in or with the Holy Spirit:
For by one Spirit are we all baptized into
one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have
been all made to drink into one Spirit. (I Cor. 12:13)
Know ye not, that so many of us as were
baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism
into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the
Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the
likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin
might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. (Rom. 6:3-6)
For as many of you as have been baptized
into Christ have put on Christ. (Gal. 3:27)
One Lord, one faith, one baptism. (Eph. 4:5)
Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye
are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised
him from the dead. (Col. 2:12)
None
of these passages is speaking of water baptism.
Unless we realize this, we will fall into all sorts of errors and come
to very wrong conclusions, e.g., that water
saves (I Pet. 3:21) or brings us into fellowship and communion with Christ (I
Cor. 12:13).
The
difference between sign and reality is clearly evident in the fact that not all
who are baptized with water receive the reality
of baptism. There are, both in Baptist
and in paedobaptist churches, those who never have the saving reality which
water baptism pictures. Nor do all who
remain unbaptized with water thereby forfeit the spiritual reality of baptism
by which we are saved. Many who die in
infancy unbaptized do inherit the kingdom of heaven, especially from among
those infants who come from Christian families and inherit it because, though unbaptized
with water, they are baptized with the blood and Spirit of Christ.
Nevertheless,
the two—sign and reality—are related.
The one points to the other, and that may not be forgotten. A sign that said “Chicago,” but pointed to
Houston, would only mislead and deceive.
A sign must always point to the reality if it is to be of help to
us. Thus, the sign must match the
reality, and the reality must match the sign.
This
difference between the sign of baptism and the spiritual reality is called, by
Ursinus, “double water”:
There is, therefore, in baptism, a double
water; the one external and visible, which is elementary; the other internal,
invisible and heavenly, which is the blood and Spirit of Christ. There is, also, a double washing in baptism;
the one external, visible, and signifying, viz: the remission of sins on
account of the blood of Christ shed for us, and our regeneration by the Holy
Spirit and engrafting into his body, which is spiritual, and perceived only by
faith and the Spirit. Lastly, there is a
double dispenser of baptism: the one an external dispenser of the external,
which is the minister of the church, baptizing us by his hand with water; the
other an internal dispenser of the internal, which is Christ himself, baptizing
us with his blood and Spirit.[3]
That
means that the question of the mode of water
baptism can, to some extent, be answered by examining the mode of spiritual baptism. If we ask, “How are we baptized by the blood
and Spirit of Christ?” the answer of Scripture is “by sprinkling or pouring.” It would be strange, not to say misleading,
if sign and reality did not match at that point.
By
the same token, the reality must also “match” the sign. It would not do at all to have the eating of bread and drinking of wine,
though they also represent the death of Christ, as symbols of the cleansing of sin by Christ’s
sacrifice. In baptism, cleansing is the
reality and so the sign which points to that reality must also speak of
cleansing.
Indeed,
Christ has given us the sign to help us understand and believe the
reality. If I say, “Can anything really
wash away my sin? Wash it all away? That is too much to believe. My sins are too great and too many,” then the
sign of baptism says, “As really as water washes away the filth of the body, so
really does the blood of Christ wash away sin.” Thus the sacrament of baptism encourages and
supports my faith in Him and His sacrifice.
We
believe that Baptists are wrong at this point in their insistence on immersion. Since the blood and Spirit of Christ—the two
things represented by the water of baptism—are applied by sprinkling or
pouring, to administer the sign by immersion reduces the correspondence between
sign and reality and lessens the effectiveness of the sign insofar as it is
supposed to point us to Christ’s blood and Spirit as the only hope of spiritual
cleansing.
This
is true especially in the fact that baptism by immersion suggests that it is
the quantity of the water, and therefore of the blood and Spirit which makes
the difference, when, in fact, it is not the quantity, but the value of
the blood and Spirit which determines their power. They are powerful not because there is enough
of the blood of Christ to immerse the whole world, but because it is the
blood of the Son of God—one drop of whose blood is sufficient to make
complete atonement for sin.
Next section: “The Biblical Ground for Sprinkling”
==========
FOOTNOTES:
1.
See previous section: “The
Symbolism of Baptism”
2. Michael Kimmitt, Baptism:
Meaning, Mode & Subjects (Trelawnyd: K & M Books, 1997), p. 9.
3. Zacharias
Ursinus, Commentary on the Heidelberg
Catechism, trans. G. W. Williard (New Jersey; Presbyterian and Reformed,
n.d.), p. 372.
No comments:
Post a Comment