While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy
Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. And they of the circumcision which
believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the
Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. For they heard them
speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, Can any man forbid
water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as
well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then
prayed they him to tarry certain days (Acts 10:44-48).
BAPTIST ARGUMENT:
“How does this text imply infant baptism?”
(I)
Rev. Ronald
Hanko
[Source:
Sprinkling, Infant Baptism and the Bible]
Baptists
insist that those who were baptized in the house of Cornelius were those who
heard the Word and upon whom the Holy Spirit came (v. 44)—in other words, those
and those only who were old enough to respond in faith to Peter’s preaching. It should be noted, however, that the
language of the passage does not exclude infants or the possibility that there
were infants as well as adults baptized on this occasion.
In
everyday speech, we include in statements of this sort those to whom the
statement does not always strictly apply.
I might say, for example, “We are driving to the store and shopping for
groceries.” That does not imply that
everyone who goes to the store is actually capable of driving, selecting items
and paying for them.” Thus, when verse
48 speaks of “them” being baptized, we understand that there were those who
were capable of responding to Peter’s preaching, but may not assume that every
single baptized individual was.
Family
baptism is the rule of Scripture, a rule that can only be obeyed when families,
including children are baptized!
---------------------------------------------
(II)
More to come! (DV)
No comments:
Post a Comment