Rev.
Ronald Hanko
Rev. Hanko is a minister in
the Protestant Reformed Churches in America and has authored a number of books,
including (among others) the following: Doctrine According to Godliness: A Primer on Reformed Doctrine (2004), The Coming of
Zion’s Redeemer: Commentary on Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi (2015). He was also the
joint author of Saved by
Grace: A Study of the Five Points of Calvinism (1995) and its accompanying study
guide (all of which can be purchased at http://www.cprc.co.uk and http://www.rfpa.org).
*
* * * * *
It has often been claimed that the New Testament word “baptism” always
and only means “to immerse” or “to submerse.”
Carson, a Baptist, says: “Baptism in the whole history of the Greek
language has but one [meaning]. It not
only signifies to ... immerse, but it never has any other meaning.”[1] Not
only do Baptists claim this, but many paedobaptists concede the point. Among Baptists, therefore, this understanding
of the word leads to an insistence that baptism by immersion is the only valid
baptism.
A little word study will show, however, that it
is not the case that baptism means immersion.
Indeed, the word tells us nothing at all about the mode of baptism. That must be learned from other
considerations.
Such study will show that there are a number of
passages in the New Testament in which the word cannot and does not have the
meaning “immerse” or “submerse.” We
plead, therefore, with those who believe otherwise, to hear our side of the
matter and not just to charge us with blindly following human traditions in not
practicing baptism by immersion.
Matthew 20:22-23
One passage is Matthew 20:22-23:
And Jesus answered and said,
Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to
drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism
that I am baptized with? They say unto
him, we are able. And he saith unto
them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I
am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to
give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of the Father.
To understand baptism as “immersion” in this
passage is impossible. This is easily
seen if one simply substitutes the word immersion or immersed for
the word baptism or baptized in the verses. That Jesus is referring to His suffering and
death is evident from the reference to His cup in Matthew 26:39: “O my Father,
if it be possible, let this cup pass from me.”
Drinking of that cup and being baptized are the same thing in Matthew
20:22-23. Drinking and being immersed
are two very different things.
To say that He was to be immersed in
suffering or death, or that his suffering and death are an immersion
means little. As we will see, the idea
is rather that He would come into the closest
possible contact with suffering and death: He would taste suffering and death to the full. If we understand baptism to mean coming into contact with suffering and
death, then the idea of baptism and drinking fit nicely together.
Mark 7:1-5
Nor can baptism mean immersion in Mark 7:1-5,
where Scripture speaks of the washing of cups, pots, brazen vessels, and of
tables, and uses the Greek word “baptize” for these washings:
Then came together unto him
the Pharisees, and certain of the scribes, which came from Jerusalem. And when they saw some of his disciples eat
bread with defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found
fault. For the Pharisees, and all the
Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the
elders. And when they come from the
market, except they wash [i.e., baptize themselves—RH], they eat not.
And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the
washing [i.e., baptizing—RH] of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of
tables. Then the Pharisees and scribes
asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders,
but eat bread with unwashen hands?
Here, though the word “baptize” might mean
immersion in reference to the cups, pots and vessels, it is ridiculous to think
that it must have that meaning in relation to tables, or to think that
the Pharisees immersed themselves every time they came from the market.
Luke 11:37-38
In Luke 11:37-38 we read that Jesus was
criticized by the Pharisees for not washing before dinner:
And as he spake, a certain
Pharisee besought him to dine with him: and he went in, and sat down to
meat. And when the Pharisee saw it, he
marvelled that he had not first washed [i.e., baptized himself—RH]
before dinner.
Here, too, the word translated “washed” in the
KJV is a form of the Greek word “baptize,” but cannot mean immersion in the
sense that Jesus took a bath before dinner. It does not even necessarily refer to the
immersion of His hands (cf. also the previous passage, Mark 7:2-5). Jewish tradition, summarized in the Talmud,
did not require immersion, but speaks of “hands made clean as far as the wrist …”
“If he poured the first water over the hands as far as the wrist and poured the
second water over the hands beyond the wrist and the latter flowed back to the
hands, the hands nevertheless become clean.”[2]
In Jewish tradition, therefore, the baptizing of hands referred to pouring
water over the hands, not to immersing them.
Holy Spirit Baptism
That baptism does not mean immersion is also
clear from the verses that describe the gift of the Holy Spirit as a
baptism. None of these passages refer to
an immersion, but to the outpouring, shedding forth or sprinkling of the Spirit:
Until the spirit be poured
upon us from on high, and the wilderness be a fruitful field, and the fruitful
field be counted for a forest. (Isa. 32:15)
For I will pour water
upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my
spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring. (Isa. 44:3)
And it shall come to pass
afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons
and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young
men shall see visions: And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in
those days will I pour out my spirit. (Joel 2:28-29)
And Jesus, when he was
baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were
opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove,
and lighting upon him. (Matt. 3:16)
And John bare record, saying,
I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon
him. And I knew him not: but he that
sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see
the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which
baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. (John 1:32-33)
While Peter yet spake these
words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. And they of the circumcision which believed
were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also
was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Acts 10:44-45)
I Corinthians 10:2
Even more important is I Corinthians 10:2,
which in the Greek speaks literally of the Israelites being baptized into Moses: “And were all
baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea.” Of this passage we will have more to say, but
it should be noted here that the Israelites, though they were baptized, were never immersed in the cloud or the sea: they
went over on dry ground (Exod. 14:16, 22, 29; 15:19). Indeed, the verse speaks of their being
baptized in the cloud and in the sea, but into
Moses by the cloud and sea. Can the verse possibly be saying that they were
immersed in Moses? The word must
mean something else. It means, once
again, that they were brought into the closest
possible contact with Moses as a mediator.
I Peter 3:20-21
I Peter 3:20-21 speaks of the flood as one of
the great Old Testament pictures of baptism:
Which sometime were
disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah,
while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by
water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the
putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience
toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
This Old Testament baptism was not by immersion
either, and the word “baptism,” when used by Peter to describe the flood,
cannot mean “immersion.” Noah and his
family were not immersed in the waters of the flood.
I Corinthians 1:13
Paul speaks of baptism in I Corinthians 1:13 (“Is
Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of
Paul?”) and Jesus Himself speaks of it in Matthew 28:19 as baptism in
(literally “into”) the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit (“Go ye
therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and
of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”). What
could it possibly mean to be immersed
in the Name of the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit or in any other name? It
means, rather, to be brought into the closest
possible contact with that great Name.
I Corinthians 12:13
The same is true of I Corinthians 12:13, which
speaks of being baptized into one body:
For by one Spirit are we all
baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free;
and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Can the Word of God be saying that we are immersed in one body? It is difficult to see how that could have
any meaning. Indeed, in the rest of the
verse, the comparison is not to a bath or some kind of immersion, but to drinking! Once again, the emphasis is not on immersion
but on the closest possible contact with something—in this case, the
body of Christ which is the church.
Hebrews 9:10
Finally, Hebrews 9:10 speaks of the many
“washings” of the Old Testament as “baptisms” and makes specific mention of
three of those baptisms in verses 13, 19 and 21, none of which were immersions,
but were sprinklings or pourings:
Which stood only in meats and
drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them
until the time of reformation. (10)
For if the blood of bulls and
of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth
to the purifying of the flesh (13)
For when Moses had spoken
every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of
calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled
both the book, and all the people (19)
Moreover he sprinkled
with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry. (21)
Those who do not know Greek should understand
that the word translated “washings” in the KJV is really the Greek word
“baptisms.” This can easily be checked
in a good concordance. The washings or
baptisms referred to were all by
sprinkling or pouring (cf. Exod. 24:7-8; Lev. 14:4-7, 49-52; 16:14, 19; Num.
19:18-19).
What,
then, does the word baptism mean?
It means to bring two things into
the closest contact, so that the condition of the one is changed by the other. One can therefore be baptized with fire, with
the sword, with the Spirit, into death or into Moses, all of which bring about
great changes in one’s condition, without ever being immersed in anything.
Dale defines “baptize” thus:
Whatever is capable of
thoroughly changing the character, state or condition of any object, is capable
of baptizing that object: and by such change of character, state or condition
does, in fact, baptize it.[3]
Even today, we use the word “baptism” in this
sense when we speak of a soldier’s first battle as a “baptism by fire.” Then, too, the idea is not that he is immersed
in enemy fire, but rather that he, for the first time, comes into close contact
with it, and is forever changed by such contact.
Thus, to be baptized into Moses meant that
Israel was brought into contact with him as the God-appointed and typical
mediator, in such a way that their condition was changed from slavery to
freedom. That Christ was baptized with
death does not mean He was immersed in it, but that He was brought into the
closest possible contact with it so that His condition was changed from being
counted guilty before God, to being justified on our behalf.
When Scripture says, therefore, that we are
baptized into Christ’s death and resurrection (Rom. 6:1-6), it is not saying
that somehow we are immersed in those events (whatever that would mean). It refers instead to the fact that we,
through faith, are brought into contact with His death and resurrection, by
which our condition is completely changed:
What shall we say then? Shall
we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer
therein? Know ye not, that so many of us
as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism
into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the
Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the
likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin
might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
That is the meaning of baptism and the reality
of baptism for us!
It should be evident that this is the real
meaning of the word “baptism” from the fact that it perfectly fits all the
Scripture passages in which the word is used.
The meaning “immersion” does not so fit, in spite of all the Baptist
protestations to the contrary.
The point, then, of this chapter is that the
word baptism does not and cannot mean only, ever and always immersion,
as the Baptists insist. In fact, the
word says nothing about the mode of baptism.
That must be determined from other Scriptures. If baptism does not mean immersion, however,
one of the principal Baptist arguments for immersion is destroyed.
==========
FOOTNOTES:
1. Alexander Carson, Baptism in its Modes and Subjects (Philadelphia, 1845), p. 19.
2. Cf. Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1959), vol. II, pp. 9-15.
3. Dale, Classic
Baptism, pp. 352-54. Quoted in
Adams, The Meaning and Mode of Baptism,
p. 4.
[Next section: "The Symbolism of Baptism"]
No comments:
Post a Comment