Reformed
theology, in the defense of infant baptism, holds that there is only one covenant of grace taught throughout
Scripture, as opposed to the Baptist/Dispensationalist position which holds
that there are two or more covenants. (For a brief overview defending this
particular point, click here).
That there is only one covenant, is proven,
apart from other considerations, by the simple fact that God’s covenant is
described (in many places) as “everlasting”
(i.e. forever/never-ending). By definition, there can only be one everlasting
covenant.
However,
Baptists and Dispensationalists (as well as proponents of “New Covenant
Theology”) respond to this position by claiming that the word rendered
“everlasting” in the Authorized Version (KJV), doesn’t always mean “never-ending”
or “forever” but can rather mean merely “a long period of time” (i.e. something
that can come to an end; something
that can be temporary).
In response to this, Prof. Herman Hanko, of the Protestant Reformed Churches in America, comments:
*
* * * * *
[Source: Herman Hanko, We and Our
Children: The Reformed Doctrine of Infant Baptism (RFPA, 2004), chapter
6, p. 79]
Scripture
places great emphasis on the fact that the covenant lines followed from father
to son within the whole of Old Testament times. This was not only true of the
nation of Israel, but was also true before God formed Israel as a nation. The
covenant line can be traced from Adam to Seth, to Enoch, to Methuselah, to
Lamech, and to Noah (Gen. 5). After the flood, that line continued from Shem to
Arphaxad, to Salah, to Eber, to Peleg, to Reu, to Serug, to Nahor, to Terah, and
to Abraham (Gen. 10, 11). After Abraham, the line continued through Isaac and
Jacob, and from the sons of Jacob to the twelve tribes, and the royal line
continued through the kings of Judah to Christ. Always that covenant was in the
line of generations.
This
emphasis on generations appears
repeatedly in Abraham’s life. It appears in its basic form in God’s promise to
Abraham: “And I will be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee” (Gen.
17:7).
It
is worth our notice that God speaks here of an “everlasting” covenant. Baptists
object that the word “everlasting” in the Old Testament does not always mean “everlasting,”
but often means simply “a long time.”
God
established his covenant with Abraham and his seed as an “everlasting”
covenant. The nature of the covenant is everlasting. If the nature of the covenant
established with Abraham and his seed is everlasting, then the principle that
that covenant continues in the line of generations is a principle which belongs
to the very essence of the covenant. If the covenant in the old and new
dispensations is essentially one covenant, the principle of the covenant in the
line of generations is also a principle which continues throughout all time.
[Note:
While various Hebrew words are translated as “forever, ever, everlasting,” and
the like, the word that is used most often as a reference to God as everlasting
is also the word that is repeatedly used to describe God’s covenant. It is not
an exaggeration to say that whenever the term “everlasting” is applied to the covenant,
it indicates that the covenant is forever.]
*
* * * * *
[Source: Herman Hanko, We and Our
Children: The Reformed Doctrine of Infant Baptism (RFPA, 2004), chapter
8, pp. 138-140]
Much
has been made of the fact that although the word “everlasting” is used in the
Scriptures to describe the nature of the covenant, nevertheless this word does
not always mean everlasting, but sometimes has the connotation of a long period
of time. Baptists argue that when God told Abraham he would establish an
everlasting covenant with Abraham and his seed (Gen. 17:7), this means only
that God would establish a covenant which would last for a long period of time.
I
have briefly faced this question in chapter 6, I will make only a few
additional remarks.
It
is true that the Hebrew word does not always mean “forever” or “everlasting” in
the Old Testament, but this does not indicate that it *never* has this meaning.
The basic meaning “for a long time” can mean, and often does mean, “for a long
time extending from before history and into the future beyond history a future
without end.” This is the meaning of Psalm 90:2: “Before the mountains were
brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from
everlasting to everlasting, thou art God.”
The
many times that the word “everlasting” appears in Scripture with the word “covenant”
surely proves beyond doubt that everlasting in the sense of unending time is
meant. According to Young’s concordance, the Hebrew word is rendered as “everlasting”
at least fifty-nine times in the Authorized Version, and of these, fourteen
uses are applied to God’s covenant. Consider the following passages: “Incline
your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and I will make an
everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David” (Isa. 55:3).
Isaiah spoke this passage from the prophetic perspective of the captivity of
the children of Judah. The nature of the “everlasting covenant” is “the sure
mercies of David,” a clear reference to Psalm 89. That this covenant of which
Isaiah spoke never referred to the nation of Judah is evident from the fact
that Judah, even after the return from captivity, never restored the throne of
David of which Israel spoke and sang in Psalm 89. The clear reference is to the
covenant established and fulfilled with and in Christ.
The
same is true of Isaiah 61:8, 9: “For I the LORD love judgment, I hate robbery
for burnt offering; and I will direct their work in truth, and I will make an
everlasting covenant with their offspring among the people: all that see them
shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the LORD hath blessed.”
Here, very clearly, God speaks of an everlasting covenant which has, as its
characteristic, that “their seed shall be known among the Gentiles.” It is
impossible to make this refer to national Israel and to speak of a covenant
established for a long time in the old dispensation only.
Another
interesting passage is Ezekiel 37:26, 27: “Moreover, I will make a covenant of
peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will
place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them
for evermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God,
and they shall be my people.” Clearly this refers to the full realization of
God’s covenant spoken of in Revelation 21:3: “And I heard a great voice out of
heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell
with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them,
and be their God.”
It
cannot possibly be denied that reference is made in Ezekiel to the very same
covenant of which Revelation 21 speaks as being fulfilled at the coming of our
Lord when all things shall be made new. But then also, the covenant spoken of
is indeed an “everlasting covenant.” It requires considerable exegetical nerve,
therefore, to insist that the “everlasting covenant” spoken of in Genesis 17:7
is a covenant which shall only endure “for a long time,” that is, for the
period of the old dispensation. This is indeed impossible when we consider the
fact that Paul makes specific reference to this very passage in Galatians 3:16,
where the text states that the covenant is established with Christ, for Christ
is the seed of Abraham. If that covenant is established with Christ, then
surely it is an everlasting covenant, and not a covenant which endures only for
the period of the old dispensation.
One
more passage will surely establish that the word “everlasting,” as a
description of God’s covenant, refers to the new dispensation as well as the
old, and to everlasting life in heaven. “As for me, this is my covenant with
them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have
put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of
thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith the LORD, from
henceforth and for ever” (Isa. 59:21). This passage must be understood in the
light of the preceding verse, which speaks of the coming of the Messiah: “And
the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in
Jacob, saith the LORD.” This text speaks of the time when Israel’s Redeemer will
come and will give the Spirit to all the people of God at Pentecost. But that
same Spirit would be in the mouth of those who are the true Israel of God,
their seed, and their seed’s seed, forever. That outpouring of the Spirit is
God’s covenant with his people.
=============
QUESTION BOX:
Q. 1. “Does not the Scriptures speak of an ‘everlasting’
Levitical priesthood? (Num. 25:11-13) The Levitical priesthood only lasted for
a brief amount of time. Surely this proves that the word ‘everlasting’ doesn’t
necessarily mean ‘unending’ or ‘forever’?”
Here
is a page specifically dealing with Numbers 25:13:
######################
Q. 2. “Isaiah 24:5 speaks of individuals who have ‘broken the everlasting covenant.’ Other passages speak along similar lines. How can something that is said to be ‘forever/unending’ be ‘broken’? Surely this proves that the word ‘everlasting’ does not mean the covenant is ‘forever/unending’?”
Q. 2. “Isaiah 24:5 speaks of individuals who have ‘broken the everlasting covenant.’ Other passages speak along similar lines. How can something that is said to be ‘forever/unending’ be ‘broken’? Surely this proves that the word ‘everlasting’ does not mean the covenant is ‘forever/unending’?”
(A
response will be provided to this fine question, shortly, DV)
aying that there is only "the one church" is like saying that there
ReplyDeleteis only the one Israel
what does it mean to say that?
is the one Israel Christ himself, and has nothing to do with any
distinction between those who know and believe the gospel or not?
is the one Israel a collective (not one person but one group)---all
who believe the gospel are one?
is the one Israel all the physical children of the specific
genealogical line between Jacob an Christ, and thefore "one group"
that inclubes both some of those who believe the gospel and some who
don't believe the gospel
or does your preacher want to keep things uncomplicated, and not think
about the things we don't think about?
Is a body not now assembled a body?
Did God's imputaation one time only put you a body?
Does the Holy Spirit give gifts to the Holy Spirit's people?
Deos the Holy Spirit give us Christ to indwell us?
Were all elect together called when they were elected?
Is the one baptism with or without water?
Is the one baptism with or without Christ giving the Spirit?
Ephesians 4: 4 There is one body and one Holy Spirit—just as you
were called to one hope at your calling— 5 one Lord, one faith, one
baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all
and in all. 7 Now grace was given to EACH one of US according to the
measure of Christ's gift . 8 Because Psalm 68 says:
When He ascended on high,
He took prisoners into captivity;
He gave gifts to people.[
/// [saying] that there is only "the one church" is like saying that there
Deleteis only the one Israel ///
OT Israel *IS* the Church.
Many scripture texts prove this.
"Israel" can also be said to be Christ. But the church is the "body" of Christ.
ReplyDeleteGod promised Abraham lots of land
God did not pormise you lots of land
God promised Abraham that one of his ch9ildren would be Jesus
God did not promise you that 0ne of your children will be Jesus
there is not going to be another Jesus
the God Abraham is living
but Abrtaham si not now living
Abraham is dead
Abrahm needs to be resurrected
Abraham needs Jesus to come back to earth
Abraham belioeved in resurrection
father abraham in the parable had not yet been resurrected
father Abraham in the poarable was not on the "heaven side" of hades
the intermediate state for both justified and condemned is death
Abraham is a prabl;e in the parable
Galatians 3 says that the promises (of the land, and the covenant) were made to Abraham "and to his seed" (v. 16).
DeleteGalatians 3 also says that if ye be in Christ, ye are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the [same] promise (which promise is the one made to Abraham: "and to thy seed will I give all the land of ....").
So your claim that "God did not pormise [sic.] you lots of land" is wrong.
... unless it can be proved that NT believers are not of the "seed of Abraham" (as Paul claims in Galatians 3)
:)