Rev.
Ronald Hanko
[Source: Doctrine According
to Godliness: A Primer on Reformed Doctrine – RFPA, 2012]
If
God’s covenant is everlasting, and
Scripture often says that it is, then there can be only one covenant. A
temporary covenant can be replaced, but God’s covenant is not temporary.
Also,
if the covenant is unbreakable, there
can be but one covenant. That it is unbreakable, Scripture testifies in Judges
2:1, Psalm 89:34, Jeremiah 33:20–21, and many other passages. It is therefore
also the only covenant.
If
the covenant is God’s covenant, and
if God’s covenant is the relationship between the three persons of the Trinity,
then, too, the covenant must be one, because God is one.
We
hold to one covenant over against
dispensationalism, with its many covenants. And we teach one covenant over
against the Baptist position, which distinguishes between the old covenant and
the new, at least as far as the sign of the covenant is concerned. We also
reject the older teaching that there is a separate and distinct “covenant of
works” with Adam.
The
many Scripture passages that speak of an everlasting covenant (singular) prove this. We refer our readers to such
Scriptures as Genesis 17:7, 2 Samuel 23:5, Psalm 105:8–10, Isaiah 55:3, Ezekiel
16:60–62, and Hebrews 13:20.
But
what about all the passages that speak of covenants in the plural (Rom. 9:4; Gal. 4:24; and others)? And what about the
passages that speak of an old and a new covenant (Jer. 31:31–33; Heb.
8:6–13)?
Unless
we are willing to accept the idea that the Bible can contradict itself (and
that therefore God can contradict himself), we must reconcile these passages with those that teach one covenant.
Scripture helps us do that by some of the language it uses.
Scripture
speaks of God’s remembering his
covenant (Lev. 26:42; Luke 1:72), giving
his covenant (Num. 25:12; Acts 7:8), declaring
it (Deut. 4:13), and keeping it (1
Kings 8:23). These expressions help us see that when God establishes his
covenant or makes a covenant, he is not discarding the old and bringing in an entirely new covenant, but only giving a
new revelation of his one covenant of
grace. In that sense only are there old and new covenants, or more than one
covenant.
This
one covenant can never be anything but a covenant of grace. There is no other basis on which we can live in a
relationship with God except his undeserved favor
toward us. Even Adam, though he by his obedience could continue to enjoy a
covenant relationship with God, was not in that relationship by merit.
We
reject, therefore, the teaching that the covenant with Adam was a covenant of
works based on merit, and not on grace. Especially we reject the idea that in
that covenant Adam could have merited
eternal life by his obedience.
Luke
17:10 destroys every possibility of merit when it says, “So likewise ye, when
ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are
unprofitable [unmeriting] servants: we have done that which was our duty to
do.” The everlasting covenant of God is all of grace.
No comments:
Post a Comment