Sunday, 19 July 2020

Old Testament Baptisms



Rev. Ronald Hanko



Rev. Hanko is a minister in the Protestant Reformed Churches in America and has authored a number of books, including (among others) the following: Doctrine According to Godliness: A Primer on Reformed Doctrine (2004), The Coming of Zion’s Redeemer: Commentary on Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi (2015). He was also the joint author of Saved by Grace: A Study of the Five Points of Calvinism (1995) and its accompanying study guide (all of which can be purchased at http://www.cprc.co.uk and http://www.rfpa.org).


*          *          *          *          *          *


[Previous section: “The Baptism of the Ethiopian Eunuch”]


The two great Old Testament baptisms, the Flood and the passage of Israel through the Red Sea, have some bearing on the whole question of the mode of baptism, if only because these passages are consistently misinterpreted by the Baptists.  They insist that baptism means immersion—only, ever, always immersion.  This is not true in the case of these typical baptisms, and so the Baptist argument is proved false.
      
It must be emphasized, first of all, that these Old Testament events were baptisms.  The New Testament itself defines them as such, using the New Testament word, the same word that is always used in the New Testament to describe both the water-sign of baptism and the spiritual reality to which that sign points.  The New Testament defines the Flood as a baptism in I Peter 3:21; “The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us.”  The passage of Israel through the Red Sea is also called a baptism in I Corinthians 10:1-2; “Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea.”
      
Recognizing the fact that the New Testament so clearly identifies these events as baptisms, some Baptists have tried to find immersion in the record of these Old Testament events.  It has been suggested, for example, that the Israelites were immersed in the Red Sea in that the cloud was above them and the water on both sides.  We have already quoted John Gill along these lines.  Another Baptist writer, arguing that baptism means burial and therefore immersion writes: “The children of Israel were completely buried in the sea and in the cloud, when they were ‘baptized into Moses.’”[1]  Some Baptists have even suggested that the Israelites came through the sea completely soaked.
      
All this is, however, contrary to the testimony of Scripture.  For one thing, Scripture clearly states that the Israelites came through the sea on dry ground (Exod. 14:16, 22, 29; 15:19) and that they themselves were “dry shod” and not soaking wet (Isa. 11:15-16):

But lift thou up thy rod, and stretch out thine hand over the sea, and divide it: and the children of Israel shall go on dry ground through the midst of the sea ... And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left ... But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. (Exod. 14:16, 22, 29)

For the horse of Pharaoh went in with his chariots and with his horsemen into the sea, and the LORD brought again the waters of the sea upon them; but the children of Israel went on dry land in the midst of the sea. (Exod. 15:19)

And the LORD shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian sea; and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the river, and shall smite it in the seven streams, and make men go over dryshod.  And there shall be an highway for the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria; like as it was to Israel in the day that he came up out of the land of Egypt. (Isa. 11:15-16)



Scripture also makes it clear that the Israelites were not “surrounded by water,” as some Baptists suggest.  The cloud was not over them, at least not when they passed through the sea, but behind them, separating them from the Egyptians (Exod. 14:19-20):



And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them: And it came between the camp of the Egyptians and the camp of Israel; and it was a cloud and darkness to them, but it gave light by night to these: so that the one came not near the other all the night.



Even more importantly, however, the fact is that the Israelites were in no sense of the word immersed; nor did they even get wet in this baptism.  This was the driest baptism on record, contradicting the Baptist assumption that a person is not baptized unless he is completely wet.  All of which is to say that neither the amount of water, nor the manner of its application, are the important things in this Old Testament baptism.

What was true of Israel at the Red Sea was also true of Noah and his family.  In that baptism, too, no one who was baptized was immersed, even though the water saved them.  Noah and his family were born up by the water and carried into a new world, but the only ones who were “immersed” were the ungodly.

There is no way, therefore, that baptism always means immersion, all arguments of the Baptists to the contrary.  Nor can these events be dismissed by an appeal to the fact that they were in the Old Testament and were but types, for the New Testament clearly and unmistakably identifies them as baptisms.




==========
FOOTNOTES:

1.  J. J. Sims, Christian Baptism: the Plain Teaching of the Word of God (Pickering & Inglis: Glasgow, n.d.), p. 27.






No comments:

Post a Comment